TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
1 Introduction 5
1.1 Project Organization and Contacts of Key Management 5
1.2 Programme 6
1.3 Summary of Construction Works 6
2 Environmental Monitoring
and Audit Requirements 7
2.1 Monitoring Parameters 7
2.2 Monitoring Locations 7
2.3 Environmental Quality Performance Limits (Action/Limit
Levels) 7
2.4 Environmental Mitigation Measures 7
3 air quality monitoring 8
4 Noise MONITORING 8
5 Advice on the Solid and
Liquid Waste Management Status 9
6 Summary of Exceedances of
the Environmental Quality Performance Limit 10
7 Summary of Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions 10
8 REVIEW of THE VALIDITY OF
THE EIA/ERR Predictions 11
9 Review of the effectivness
and efficiency of mitigation measures 11
10 Review of success of
EM&A Programme 11
11 Comments, recommendations
and Conclusions 12
11.1 Comments 12
11.2 Recommendations 13
11.3 Conclusions 14
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Contact Information of Key Personnel
Table 3.1 Summary of 1-hour TSP
Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period
Table 3.2 Summary of 24-hour
TSP Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period
Table 4.1 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in
the Reporting Period
Table 5.1 Summary of
Waste Flow Table for Contract
No. HY/2012/06
Table 5.2 Summary of Waste Flow Table for Contract No.
02/HY/2015 (Works Order Nos. CB128520-5 and CB128519-0)
Figures
Figure 1.1 General
Project Layout Plan of Contract No. HY/2012/06
Figure 1.2
General Project Layout Plan of Contract No. 02/HY/2015 (Works Order Nos. CB128520-5
and CB128519-0)
Figure 1.3a-b Locations
of Monitoring Station
List of
Appendices
Appendix A Project
Organization Structure
Appendix B Construction
Programme
Appendix C Implementation
Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS)
Appendix D Summary of Action
and Limit Levels
Appendix E Impact
Air Quality Monitoring Results and their Graphical Presentation
Appendix F Meteorological
Data
Appendix G Impact
Daytime Construction Noise Monitoring Results and their Graphical Presentation
Appendix H Statistics
on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
The proposed
widening of Tolo Highway and Fanling Highway between Island House Interchange
and Fanling (the Project) is a Designated Project under the Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) (EIAO). An Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) Report (the approved EIA Report) together with an
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual (the approved EM&A
Manual) were completed and approved under the EIAO on 14 July 2000 (Register
Number: EIA-043/2000).
The objective of the Project
¡°Widening of Tolo Highway / Fanling Highway between Island House Interchange and
Fanling¡± is to widen Tolo Highway and Fanling Highway to dual 4-lane
carriageway in order to alleviate the current traffic congestion problems and
to cope with the increasing transport demands to and from the urban areas and
also cross boundary traffic.
The Project is a
designated project and governed by an Environmental Permit (EP-324/2008) issued
by the EPD on 23 December 2008.
Subsequently, the EPD issued Variation of Environmental Permits of EP-324/2008/A,
EP-324/2008/B, EP-324/2008/C
and EP-324/2008/D on 31 January 2012, 17 March 2014, 27
March 2015 and 27 August 2015 respectively. The
current valid VEP was applied on 29 December 2016 and the VEP (EP-324/2008/E)
was subsequently granted on 26 January 2017.
The
construction works for this Project are delivered in 2 stages i.e. Stage 1
(between Island House Interchange and Tai Hang) and Stage 2 (between Tai Hang
and Wo Hop Shek Interchange). Stage
2 would be implemented under three works contracts. Contract No. HY/2012/06 ¡°Widening of
Fanling Highway ¨C Tai Hang to Wo Hop Shek Interchange¡± and the entrusted
portion to CEDD under Contract No. CV/2012/09 ¡°Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary
Control Point Site Formation and Infrastructure Works ¨C Contract 3¡±. In addition, Contract No. ¡°Provision of
Bus-Bus Interchange on Fanling Highway Kowloon Bound¡± was carried out within
the site boundary of Contract No. 02/HY/2015. This report focuses on Contract No. HY/2012/06 ¡°Widening of Fanling Highway ¨C Tai Hang to
Wo Hop Shek Interchange¡± in Stage
2 of the Project and ¡°Provision of
Bus-Bus Interchange on Fanling Highway Kowloon Bound¡± under Works Order Nos.
CB128520-5 and CB128519-0 in Contract No. 02/HY/2015 ¡°Highway Department Term
Contract (Management and Maintenance of Roads in Tai Po and North District
excluding High Speed Roads 2016-2022)¡±. The construction works of Works Order Nos. CB128520-5 and CB128519-0
under Contract No. 02/HY/2015 have been completed on 23 May 2018.
Pursuant to
the EP (EP-324/2008/E) Condition 2.7, the Capture Survey Trip Report
for Ma Wat River Northern Meander (Version 2) for the Project was submitted on
24 December 2013 by the Environmental Team (ET) and verified by the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) on 6 January 2014.
The construction phase of the Contract under the EP and the Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme of the contract commenced on 21 November
2013. The impact environmental monitoring and audit includes air quality and
noise monitoring.
This
report documents the findings of EM&A works conducted in the period between
1 November 2017 and 31 October 2018. As informed by the Contractor,
construction activities of Contract No. HY/2012/06 in the reporting period
were:
-
Site clearance
-
Ground investigation
-
Pipe
laying
-
Retaining
wall construction
-
Noise
barrier
-
Excavation
-
Backfilling
-
Drainage
-
Footbridge
demolition
-
Bridge
construction
-
Piling
As
informed by the Contractor, construction activities of Works Order Nos. CB128520-5 and CB128519-0 under Contract No. 02/HY/2015 in the reporting period
were:
-
Backfilling to NB74 Bay 3 to Bay 7
-
Construction of catchpits and drainage pipes
sheetpiling at Bay 9 to Bay 10
-
Construction of footing for Bay 9 to Bay 10
-
Construction
of footing for NB74 Bay 8, 8A & 8B
-
Construction of footpath & bus lay-by
-
Construction
of Posts P27-P30
-
Construction
of wall stem for NB74 Bay 2 to Bay 10
-
Erection of NB posts and panels
-
KMB works
-
Metal frame for BBI
-
Metal frame & roof cladding of bus
shelter
-
Sheetpiling at Bay 9 to Bay 10
Reporting Change
Contract No. 02/HY/2015 (Works Order Nos. CB128520-5
and CB128519-0) has been
included in this EM&A report.
Breaches of Action and Limit
Levels for Air Quality
No exceedance
of Action and Limit Level was recorded for 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring in
the reporting period.
Breaches of Action and Limit
Levels for Noise
No Action Level exceedance of construction noise
was recorded in the reporting period. No noise complaints related to 0700 ¨C
1900 hours on normal weekdays was received and followed by the Environmental
Team in the reporting period.
One (1) Limit Level exceedance was recorded on 9
April 2018 for noise monitoring at M3. The exceedance at M3 is considered to be
contributed from background noise, possibly traffic noise from Pak Wo Road and
Fanling Highway. The exceedance was considered non-project-related.
Complaint, Notification of
Summons and Successful Prosecution
One (1) noise-related complaint
was received on 1 March 2018 and followed up by the Environmental Team. The full complaint
investigation report is annexed in Appendix M of the Monthly EM&A Report
for March 2018.
No notification of summons or successful prosecution was received in the
reporting period.
1.1.1
The project organization structure is shown in Appendix A. The key
personnel contact names and numbers are summarized in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Contact
Information of Key Personnel
Party
|
Position
|
Name
|
Telephone
|
Fax
|
ER
(Hyder-Arup-Black & Veatch Joint Venture)
|
Chief Resident Engineer
|
Edwin Chung
|
6115 0818
|
2638 0950
|
IEC
(Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited)
|
Independent Environmental Checker
|
Steven Tang
|
2828 5920
|
2827 1823
|
Contractor
of [HY/2012/06]
(China State Construction Engineering (Hong
Kong) Limited)
|
Environmental Officer
|
Michael Tsang
|
9277 4956
|
2672 2501
|
C C Chow
|
9679 6315
|
2672 2501
|
Contractor
of [02/HY/2015]
(Chiu Hing Construction &
Transportation Company Limited)
|
Safety Officer
|
Marty Tai
|
9106 5318
|
-
|
ET
(AECOM Asia Company Limited)
|
ET Leader
|
Y W Fung
|
3922 9393
|
3922 9797
|
Party
|
Position
|
Name
|
Telephone
|
Fax
|
ER
(Hyder-Arup-Black & Veatch Joint
Venture)
|
Chief Resident Engineer
|
Edwin Chung
|
6115 0818
|
2638 0950
|
IEC
(Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited)
|
Independent Environmental Checker
|
Steven Tang
|
2828 5920
|
2827 1823
|
Contractor
(China State Construction Engineering
(Hong Kong) Limited)
|
Environmental Officer
|
Michael Tsang
|
9277 4956
|
2672 2501
|
C C Chow
|
9679 6315
|
2672 2501
|
ET
(AECOM Asia Company Limited)
|
ET Leader
|
Y W Fung
|
3922 9393
|
3922 9797
|
1.2.1
The Construction Programme is shown in Appendix B.
1.3.1
Details of the construction works of Contract No. HY/2012/06 carried out
by the Contractor in this reporting period are listed below:
-
Site clearance
-
Ground investigation
-
Pipe
laying
-
Retaining
wall construction
-
Noise
barrier
-
Excavation
-
Backfilling
-
Drainage
-
Footbridge
demolition
-
Bridge
construction
-
Piling
Details of the
construction works of Works Order Nos. CB128520-5 and CB128519-0 under Contract
No. 02/HY/2015 carried out by the Contractor in this reporting period are
listed below:
-
Backfilling to NB74 Bay 3 to Bay 7
-
Construction of catchpits and drainage pipes sheetpiling
at Bay 9 to Bay 10
-
Construction of footing for Bay 9 to Bay 10
-
Construction
of footing for NB74 Bay 8, 8A & 8B
-
Construction of footpath & bus lay-by
-
Construction
of Posts P27-P30
-
Construction
of wall stem for NB74 Bay 2 to Bay 10
-
Erection of NB posts and panels
-
KMB works
-
Metal frame for BBI
-
Metal frame & roof cladding of bus
shelter
-
Sheetpiling at Bay 9 to Bay 10
1.3.2
The general layout plan of the
Project site of Contract No. HY/2012/06 and Works Order Nos. CB128520-5 and
CB128519-0 under 02/HY/2015 showing the contract
areas are shown in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2 respectively.
1.3.3
The environmental mitigation measures implementation schedule are
presented in Appendix C.
2.1.1
The updated EM&A Manual has designated 1 air quality
monitoring station and 2 noise monitoring stations to monitor environmental
impacts on air quality and noise due to Stage 2 of the Project.
2.1.2
The updated EM&A Manual also requires environmental
site inspections for air quality, noise, water quality, chemical, waste
management, ecology and landscape and visual impacts.
2.2.1
For air quality monitoring, the monitoring station was set up
at Fanling Government Secondary School, in accordance with updated EM&A
Manual. The location is shown in Figure 1.3a.
2.2.2
For noise monitoring, the monitoring stations
M2 and M3 were set up at West Tai Wo and Fanling Government Secondary School
respectively in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Figure 1.3a-b shows
the locations of the monitoring stations.
2.3.1
The environmental quality performance limits (i.e.
Action/Limit Levels) of air quality monitoring were derived from the baseline
air quality monitoring results at the monitoring station (AM2); while the
environmental quality performance limits of noise monitoring were defined in
the EM&A Manual.
2.3.2
The environmental quality performance limits are given in
Appendix D.
2.4.1
Relevant environmental mitigation measures were stipulated
in the Particular Specification and EP for the Contractor to adopt. A list of
environmental mitigation measures and their implementation statuses are given
in Appendix C.
2.5
Environmental
Impact Hypotheses Tested
2.5.1
The EIA Report concluded that with proper mitigation
measures implemented, fugitive dust emission during the construction phase
would be controlled and will not exceed the acceptable criteria.
2.5.2
For construction noise, exceedances were
predicted only at 2 schools (SR41 Wong Shiu Chi Middle School and
SR45 HK Teacher¡¯s Association Secondary School) but they are out of
the scope of this EM&A Programme. Hence, the EIA did not
anticipate any noise exceedances during the construction phase within
the scope of this EM&A Programme.
2.5.3
The above criteria have been tested under this EM&A
Programme during the reporting period.
3.1.1
In accordance with the updated EM&A Manual, baseline
1-hour and 24-hour TSP levels at one air quality
monitoring station was established. Impact
1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted for at least three times every 6 days,
while impact 24-hour TSP monitoring was carried out for at least once every 6
days.
3.1.2
The weather was mostly sunny, occasionally fine, cloudy and
rainy days in the reporting period. Weather information including the wind
speed and wind direction is annexed in Appendix F. The information was obtained
from the Hong Kong Observatory.
3.1.3
The monitoring results for 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP
monitoring are summarized in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 respectively. Detailed impact
air quality monitoring results are presented in Appendix E.
Table 3.1 Summary
of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period
Location
|
Average (mg/m3)
|
Range (mg/m3)
|
Action Level (mg/m3)
|
Limit Level (mg/m3)
|
AM2
(Fanling
Government Secondary School)
|
68.4
|
58.8 ¨C 80.6
|
317.8
|
500
|
Table 3.2 Summary
of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period
Location
|
Average (mg/m3)
|
Range (mg/m3)
|
Action Level (mg/m3)
|
Limit Level (mg/m3)
|
AM2
(Fanling
Government Secondary School)
|
37.7
|
9.2 ¨C 97.1
|
200.7
|
260
|
3.1.4
The major dust sources in the reporting period included
construction activities from Stage 2 of the Project, as well as nearby traffic
emissions.
3.1.5
All 1-hour and 24-hour TSP results were below the Action
and Limit Level in the reporting period.
3.1.6
Detailed impact air quality monitoring results are
presented in Appendix E.
4.1.1
In
accordance
with the EM&A Manual, impact noise
monitoring was conducted for at least once per week during the construction phase of the Contract.
4.1.2
The monitoring results for construction noise are summarized
in Table 4.1 and the monitoring data are provided in Appendix G.
Table
4.1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period
|
Average (dB(A))
Leq
(30 mins)
|
Range (dB(A))
Leq
(30 mins)
|
Limit Level (dB(A))
Leq
(30 mins)
|
M2*
|
68.7
|
63.1 ¨C 71.2
|
75
|
M3#
|
64.5
|
58.9 ¨C 68.3
|
65/70
|
*+3dB(A) Façade correction included
# Limit Level of 70dB(A) applies to education institutes while 65dB(A)
applies during school examination period.
4.1.3
The major noise sources during the noise monitoring
included nearby road traffic noise.
4.1.4
No Action Level exceedance of construction noise was
recorded in the reporting period. No noise complaints related to 0700 ¨C 1900
hours on normal weekdays was received and followed by the Environmental Team in
the reporting period.
4.1.5
One (1) Limit Level exceedance was recorded on 9 April 2018
for noise monitoring at M3. The exceedance at M3 is considered to be
contributed from background noise, possibly traffic noise from Pak Wo Road and
Fanling Highway. The exceedance was considered non-project-related.
4.1.6
The graphical plots of the trends of the monitoring results
are provided in Appendix G.
5.1.1
As advised by the Contractor of Contract No. HY/2012/06,
42,863 m3 of inert C&D
material was generated in the reporting month (13,077 m3 disposed of
as public fill to Tuen Mun 38, 16,755 m3 of inert C&D materials
was reused on site, 12,144 m3 of inert C&D materials was reused
in other projects and 887 m3 was broken concrete). For C&D
wastes, 1,065 m3 of general refuse was disposed of at NENT landfill, 764 kg of paper/cardboard
packaging, 8,522 kg of plastics and
35,452 kg
of metals were collected by
recycling Contractors, and 0
kg of chemical
wastes was collected by licensed Contractors in the reporting period.
5.1.2
The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by
the activities of the Project in the reporting period are summarized in Table
5.1.
Table 5.1 Summary of Waste Flow Table for Contract No. HY/2012/06
Waste
Type
|
Actual
Amount
|
Disposal/Reuse
Locations
|
Inert C&D
materials disposed of as public fill
|
13,077 m3
|
Tuen Mun 38
|
Broken concrete
|
887 m3
|
Tuen Mun 38
|
C&D wastes
disposed as general refuse
|
1,065 m3
|
NENT Landfill
|
Paper/cardboard
packaging
|
764 kg
|
Recycling Contractors
|
Plastics
|
8,522 kg
|
Recycling Contractors
|
Metals
|
35,452 kg
|
Recycling Contractors
|
C&D materials
reused on site
|
16,755 m3
|
Site Area
|
C&D materials
reused in other projects
|
12,144 m3
|
Other projects
|
Chemical wastes
|
0kg
|
Licensed Contractors
|
5.1.3
As advised by the Contractor of Works Order Nos. CB128520-5
and CB128519-0 under Contract
No. 02/HY/2015, 142 m3 of inert C&D
material was generated in the reporting month (137 m3 disposed of as
public fill to Tuen Mun 38, 0 m3 of inert C&D materials was
reused on site, 0 m3 of inert C&D materials was reused in other
projects and 5 m3 was broken concrete). For C&D wastes, 0 m3
of general refuse was disposed of at NENT
landfill, 6 kg of paper/cardboard packaging, 5 kg of plastics and 0 kg of metals were collected by
recycling Contractors in the reporting period.
5.1.4
The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by
the activities of the Project in the reporting period are shown in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2 Summary
of Waste Flow Table for Contract No. 02/HY/2015 (Works Order Nos. CB128520-5 and
CB128519-0)
Waste
Type
|
Actual
Amount
|
Disposal/Reuse
Locations
|
Inert C&D
materials disposed as public fill
|
137 m3
|
Tuen Mun 38
|
Broken concrete
|
5 m3
|
Tuen Mun 38
|
C&D wastes
disposed as general refuse
|
0 m3
|
NENT Landfill
|
Paper/cardboard
packaging
|
6 kg
|
Recycling Facilities
|
Plastics
|
5 kg
|
Recycling Facilities
|
Metals
|
0 kg
|
Recycling Facilities
|
C&D materials
reused on site
|
0 m3
|
Site Area
|
C&D materials
reused in other projects
|
0 m3
|
Other projects
|
6
Summary
of Exceedances of the Environmental Quality Performance Limit
6.1.1
All 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring results complied with
the Action / Limit Levels in the reporting period.
6.1.2
No Action Level exceedance of construction noise was
recorded in the reporting period. No noise complains related to 0700 ¨C 1900
hours on normal weekdays was received and followed by the Environmental Team in
the reporting period.
6.1.3
One (1) Limit Level exceedance was recorded on 9 April 2018
for noise monitoring at M3. The exceedance at M3 is considered to be
contributed from background noise, possibly traffic noise from Pak Wo Road and
Fanling Highway. The exceedance was considered non-project-related.
7
Summary
of Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
7.1.1
One (1) noise-related complaint was received on 1 March
2018 and followed up by the Environmental Team. The full complaint
investigation report is annexed in Appendix M of the Monthly EM&A Report
for March 2018.
7.1.2
No notification of summons or successful prosecution was
received in the reporting period.
7.1.3
The statistics on complaints, notifications of summons and
successful prosecutions are summarized in Appendix H.
7.1.4
A 24-hour complaint hotline at 6628 8366 has been
established for the Project. The hotline number is displayed at the site
entrances, fencings and project signboards, as well as printed on publications
such as newsletters for the public.
8.1.1
All the air quality monitoring results in the reporting
period were below the Action and Limit Levels. The result was in line with the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Review Report (ERR)
prediction that dust generation would be controlled and would not exceed the
acceptable criteria, with proper implementation of the recommended dust
mitigation measures.
8.1.2
Most of the noise monitoring results in the reporting
period were below the Action and Limit Levels. The result was in line with the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Review Report (ERR)
prediction that with the implementation of noise mitigation measures, the
construction noise from the Project works will meet the stipulated criterion at
the residential NSRs and at a majority of the education institutions.
8.1.3
One (1) Limit Level exceedance was recorded on 9 April 2018
for noise monitoring at M3. The exceedance at M3 is considered to be
contributed from background noise, possibly traffic noise from Pak Wo Road and
Fanling Highway. The exceedance was considered non-project-related.
1.
9.1.1 The impact air
quality and noise monitoring programme ensured that any environmental impacts
to the receivers would be readily detected and timely actions could be taken to
rectify any non-compliance. The
environmental monitoring results indicated that the construction activities in
general were in compliance with the relevant environmental requirements and
were environmentally acceptable. The weekly site inspections ensured that
all the environmental mitigation measures recommended in the EIA/ERR were
effectively implemented. Despite the minor deficiencies found during site
audits, the Contractor has taken appropriate actions to rectify deficiencies
within a reasonable timeframe. Therefore, the effectiveness and efficiency of
the mitigation measures were considered high in most of the time.
9.1.2
For all the parameters under monitoring as mentioned in
Section 8, the measured levels were in line with the EIA and ERR predictions
generally. This indicates that the mitigation measures were effectively and
efficiently implemented.
2.
10.1.1 The environmental
monitoring methodology was considered well established as the monitoring
results were found in line with the EIA predictions.
10.1.2 As effective
follow-up actions were promptly taken once exceedances were recorded, no
further exceedance occurred. The EM&A programme was considered successfully
and adequately conducted during the course of the reporting period.
11
Comments, recommendations
and Conclusions
11.1.1
According to the environmental
site inspections performed in the reporting period, the following
comments are made to the Contractor for precautionary and rectification
purposes:
Contract No. HY/2012/06
Air Quality Impact
11.1.2
The
Contractor was advised to provide adequate watering regularly for exposed area
and slope as dust suppression.
11.1.3
The
Contractor was advised to provide sufficient measures to keep the public access
road clear of dusty material.
11.1.4
The
Contractor was advised to remove the mud trails and ensure vehicles are
properly wheel washed before leaving the site.
11.1.5
The
Contractor was advised to provide valid NRMM label for all equipment before
operation.
11.1.6
The
Contractor was advised to cover the exposed stockpile of dusty materials
entirely with impervious sheeting.
11.1.7
The
Contractor was advised to cover the exposed slope properly with impervious
sheeting for dust suppression.
11.1.8
The
Contractor was advised to remove the dusty materials near the vehicle exit point,
implement measures to direct surface run-off to sedimentation tank, pave the
wheel washing area with hardcore and ensure all vehicles are properly
wheel-washed before leaving the site.
11.1.9
The
Contractor was advised to cover the stockpile of more than 20 bags of cement
entirely with impervious sheeting for dust suppression.
Construction Noise Impact
11.1.10
The
Contractor was reminded to wrap the breaker tip before operation as a noise
mitigation measure.
Water Quality Impact
11.1.11
The
Contractor was advised to remove the sandy materials near the drainage entrance
and implement measures to prevent surface runoff of site and silt from entering
the drainage system.
11.1.12
The
Contractor was advised to remove the silt and debris in drainage and ensure
flow of water without obstruction.
11.1.13
The
Contractor was advised to implement effective measures to prevent muddy water
being flowed outside the site
11.1.14
The
Contractor was advised to provide proper protection for the drainage system.
11.1.15
The
Contractor was advised to remove the general refuse and wastes in the drainage
and ensure proper protection for drainage system is provided.
11.1.16
The
Contractor was advised to clean up the public access road near site boundary
and implement effective measures to prevent muddy surface runoff being spilled
from the site to public area.
11.1.17
The
Contractor was advised to ensure the channel directing the runoff from the
wheel washing facility to sedimentation tank without overflow.
11.1.18
The
Contractor was reminded to remove the stagnant water and treat the wastewater
properly before discharge.
11.1.19
The
Contractor was advised to provide sandbags along the site boundary to prevent
surface runoff leaking outside the site area.
Chemical and Waste
Management
11.1.20
The
Contractor was advised to keep the site clean and tidy.
11.1.21
The
Contractor was advised to provide secondary containment for chemical container
to prevent potential leakage.
11.1.22
The
Contractor was advised to provide proper label for all chemicals and store the
chemical waste at a proper storage area.
11.1.23
The
Contractor was advised to plug the opening of the drip tray
to prevent potential leakage.
Landscape and Visual
Impact
11.1.24
The
Contractor.
Miscellaneous
11.1.25
Nil.
Contract
No. 02/HY/2015 (Works
Order Nos. CB128520-5 and CB128519-0)
Air
Quality Impact
11.1.26
The
Contractor should remove the mud trail and ensure vehicles are wheel-washed
properly before leaving the site.
11.1.27
The
Contractor was advised to keep the vehicle exit point clear of dusty materials.
11.1.28
The
Contractor was advised to provide adequate watering regularly for exposed area
for dust suppression.
11.1.29
The
Contractor was advised to cover the exposed stockpile of dusty materials
entirely with impervious sheeting for dust suppression.
Construction
Noise Impact
11.1.30
Nil.
Water
Quality Impact
11.1.31
The
Contractor was advised to keep the intercepting channel clear of obstacle.
Chemical and Waste Management
11.1.32
The
Contractor was advised to provide secondary containment for chemical container
to prevent potential leakage.
11.1.33
The
Contractor was advised to improve the housekeeping condition and keep the site
clean and tidy.
Landscape
and Visual Impact
11.1.34
Nil.
Miscellaneous
11.1.35
Nil.
11.2
Recommendations
11.2.1
The impact air quality and noise
monitoring programme ensures that any deterioration in environmental condition
is readily detected and timely actions are taken to rectify any
non-compliances. Assessment and analysis of monitoring results collected
demonstrated the environmental acceptability of the Project. The weekly
environmental site inspections ensure that all the environmental mitigation measures
recommended in the ERR are effectively implemented.
11.2.2
The EM&A programme
effectively monitored the environmental impacts from the construction
activities and no particular recommendations were advised for the improvement
of the programme.
11.3.1
All 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring results complied with
the Action / Limit Levels in the reporting period.
11.3.2
No Action Level exceedance of construction noise was
recorded in the reporting period. No noise complaints related to 0700 ¨C 1900
hours on normal weekdays was received and followed by Environmental Team in the
reporting period.
11.3.3
One (1) Limit Level exceedance was recorded on 9 April 2018
for noise monitoring at M3. The exceedance at M3 is considered to be
contributed from background noise, possibly traffic noise from Pak Wo Road and
Fanling Highway. The exceedance was considered non-project-related.
11.3.4
One (1) noise-related complaint was received on 1 March
2018 and followed up by the Environmental Team. The full complaint investigation
report is annexed in Appendix M of the Monthly EM&A Report for March 2018.
11.3.5
No notification of summons and successful prosecution was
received in the reporting period.