Appendix
L
Statistics
on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
|
Date
Received
|
Subject
|
Status
|
Total
no. followed up by ET in this month
|
Total
no. followed up by ET since project commencement
|
Environmental
complaints
|
14, 17 & 21 December 2012
|
EPD referred a complaint, from a resident
at Ma Wo, about dust emission in construction site
of the Tolo Highway widening construction works at
Ma Wo. The complainant contacted the Contractor
(Gammon Construction Ltd.) on 14 December 2012 and the Contractor promised
that water-spraying would be provided at the entrance of the construction
site. Although the complainant waited for 5 hours, no water-spraying was
provided by the Contractor. Fugitive dust was generated and caused serious
nuisance to the complainant’s dwelling. Subsequently, the complainant made another
call on 17 December 2012 saying that an EPD personnel contacted him in the
morning on 17 December 2012. However, still no water-spraying was provided by
the Contractor in the construction site on 17 December 2012. Fugitive dust
generated overwhelmed the entrance of complainant’s dwelling. The complainant
thereby requested the EPD to follow-up and reply the complainant as soon as
possible. Afterwards, the complainant also made other call on
21 December 2012 strongly complaining that there are no water-spraying
provided in the construction site as requested by EPD and caused continuous dust
nuisance to the complainant.
|
Investigation findings and
proposed mitigation measures submitted to all relevant parties in December
2012 and follow-up site inspection will be conducted in the next reporting
month (January 2013)
|
3
|
27
|
24 December 2012
|
EPD referred a complaint about hammering
noise generated from construction activities at the construction site for
bridge construction at Lam Kam Road and Tai Wo
Service Road West (near Wai Tau Tsuen) during the
period from 00:00 to 06:00 in the recent two weeks caused nuisance to nearby
residents.
The complainant called the Police before.
However, the police expressed that as Construction Noise Permit (CNP) had
been issued by EPD for the construction works, the complaint could not be
handled by the Police and requested the complainant contacted EPD for help.
The complainant strongly dissatisfied that
EPD issued the CNP for the construction works and no government staff had
been seen to monitor the noise. The complainant opposed the related CNP and
strongly requested to reply and follow-up as soon as possible.
The complainant expressed if the construction
works were still carried out at night time again, he would lodge the complaint
to the Director and he would contact the Media immediately for reporting.
|
The complaint was under investigation
in December 2012 and will be followed-up in the next reporting month (January
2013)
|
|||
24 December 2012
|
EPD referred a complaint about noise
nuisance generated from construction activities, at the construction site for
bridge construction between Lam Kam Road and Tai Wo
Service Road West at mid-night on Monday to Friday and ongoing for two weeks,
caused nuisance to Wai Tau Tsuen. The complainant
called the Police before and found out the related Construction Noise Permit
(CNP) in EPD’s website. However, the complainant did not provide the
reference number of the CNP. The Complaint requested the Highways Department
to stop the construction works as soon as possible.
|
The complaint was under
investigation in December 2012 and will be followed-up in the next reporting
month (January 2013)
|
|||
Notification
of summons
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
Successful
Prosecutions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
0
|