Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2009/08 |
Date: |
7 July 2010 |
Time: |
09:00 |
Inspection No.: |
039 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observation |
|
|
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observation |
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2008/09 |
Date: |
8 July 2010 |
Time: |
14:00 |
Inspection No.: |
040 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observations |
|
|
1. |
Silt inside a section of the u-channel at
Wall 8 had been cleared. However, silt was still found deposited inside a few
sections of the u-channel at Wall 8. The Contractor was reminded to clear the
u-channel more frequently, especially during rainy seasons. |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Sand
bag bunding had been provided at the section where perimeter u-channel is
missing at Wall 8. (Closed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observation |
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2008/09 |
Date: |
14 July 2010 |
Time: |
09:00 |
Inspection No.: |
041 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observation |
|
|
1. |
The site audit did not include Wall 8 area.
The condition of silt deposition in the u-channel at Wall 8 is to be
inspected in the next audit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observation |
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2009/08 |
Date: |
15 July 2010 |
Time: |
14:00 |
Inspection No.: |
042 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observation |
|
|
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observation |
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2008/09 |
Date: |
21 July 2010 |
Time: |
09:00 |
Inspection No.: |
043 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observation |
|
|
1. |
The silt inside the u-channel at Wall 8 had
been cleared. (Closed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observation |
2. |
Muddy
water from vehicle wheel washing overflowed to the public road at the site
entrance of Wall 8. The Contractor was requested to review the methodology of
the wheel washing facility at the site entracnce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2009/08 |
Date: |
22 July 2010 |
Time: |
14:00 |
Inspection No.: |
044 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observation |
|
|
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observations |
1. |
Noise
was generated from the pavement breaking work underneath Bridge 12 at Shek
Lin Road. The Contractor was advised to erect additional movable noise
barriers for noisy activities to reduce the noise nuisance to the nearby
residents. |
|
|
|
|
2. |
General
refuse and felled trees were scattered at the soil nailing area on Slope 41.
The Contractor was reminded to maintain waste sorting and proper
housekeeping. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2008/09 |
Date: |
28 July 2010 |
Time: |
09:00 |
Inspection No.: |
045 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observation |
|
|
1. |
Rectifying measures to divert the water from
vehicle wheel washing to a desilting pit had been taken by the Contractor at
the site entrance of Wall 8. No muddy water was found runoff to public road.
(Closed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observation |
|
Nil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |
Site
Inspection Summary
Contract No. |
HY/2009/08 |
Date: |
29 July 2010 |
Time: |
14:00 |
Inspection No.: |
046 |
|
Nil |
|
Follow
Up Observations |
|
|
1. |
The pavement breaking work at Bridge 12 had
been completed. No noisy activity was observed on site. (Closed) |
|
|
2. |
Proper
housekeeping had been kept at Slope 41. (Closed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Observations |
3. |
Bunding
was missing at one of the sides and several holes were observed on the
temporary bridge leading to Bridge 12B. The Contractor was advised to provide
bunding at both sides and to seal the holes on the temporary bridge to
prevent runoff to the stream underneath. |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The
water discharged to the public drain at the site entrance of Bridge 12A was
observed muddy. The Contractor was requested to stop the water discharge
immediately and check the functioning of the desilting facility before
further discharge. |
|
|
5. |
A
drip tray underneath an air compressor at Bridge 12A was overflowed with
water. The Contractor was reminded to remove the water in the drip tray. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nil |